Childhood polio left Isaac Perlman able to walk only with braces on both legs and crutches. When Perlman plays at a concert, the journey from the wings to the center of the stage is long and slow. Yet, when he plays, his talent transcends any thought of physical challenge.
Perlman was scheduled to play a difficult, challenging violin concerto. In the middle of the performance one of the strings on his violin snapped with a rifle-like popping noise that filled the entire auditorium. The orchestra immediately stopped playing and the audience held its collective breath. The assumption was he would have to put on his braces, pick up his crutches, and leave the stage. Either that or someone would have to come out with another string or replace the violin. After a brief pause, Perlman set his violin under his chin and signaled to the conductor to begin.
One person in the audience reported what happened: “I know it is impossible to play a violin concerto with only three strings. I know that and so do you, but that night, Isaac Perlman refused to know it. You could see him modulating, changing, and recomposing in his head. At one point it sounded as if he were re-tuning the strings to get a new sound that had never been heard before. When he finished, there was an awesome silence that filled the room. Then people rose and cheered. Perlman smiled, wiped his brow, and raised the bow of his violin to quiet them. He spoke, not boastfully, but quietly in a pensive tone, ‘You know, sometimes it is the artist’s task to find out how much music you can still make with what you have left.”
It is an astonishing story, with a very real message, and one we could believe of Perlman. Although it was published in the Houston Chronicle in 2001 (in a more embellished form), it’s first appearance in print appears to have been in Rabbi Wayne Dosick’s 1999 book, When Life Hurts: A Personal Journey from Adversity to Renewal (the excerpt, above). There seems, however, to be no proof that Perlman’s brilliant improvisation actually happened. The website Snopes, which researches urban legends, makes the argument, with footnotes, that it probably didn’t. We haven’t gotten to the bottom of it yet, but…
…We’re wondering if it matters if it didn’t actually happen this way? Do we discard its meaning – which we know to be TRUE, and have evidence of in endless other ways – because the actual events are in question?
Thanks again Pamela!